Characterization of consumption and costs of antimicrobials in intensive care units in a Brazilian tertiary hospital.

Background: The consumption of antimicrobials and the growing resistance of infectious agents to these drugs are not related only to health issues, but also to economic parameters. Objectives: The study objective was to evaluate the consumption of antimicrobials in General and Covid-19 Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and the impact on institutional costs in the largest institute of a tertiary public hospital. Methods: This is a quantitative and retrospective study, which analyzed consumption, through the Defined Daily Dose (DDD), and the annual direct cost of antimicrobials in Reais (R$) and Dollars (US$), from January to December 2021. Results: The total annual consumption (DDD/1000 patient-day) of antimicrobials in the ICUs was 14,368.85. ß-Lactams had the highest total annual value, with a DDD/1000 patient-day of 7062.98, being meropenem the antimicrobial that reached the highest consumption (3107.20), followed by vancomycin (2322.6). Total consumption was higher in Covid-19 ICUs than in General ICUs, and the annual direct cost of antimicrobials in ICUs was US$560,680.79. Conclusions: The study showed high consumption of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, highlighting the importance of structuring programs to manage the use of antimicrobials, both to reduce antimicrobial consumption and hospital costs, consolidating rational use even in pandemic scenarios.

Immunothrombosis and COVID-19 ‒ a nested post-hoc analysis from a 3186 patient cohort in a Latin American public reference hospital.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 is associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolism and excess mortality. Difficulties with best anticoagulation practices and their implementation motivated the current analysis of COVID-19 patients who developed Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). METHOD: This is a post-hoc analysis of a COVID-19 cohort, described in an economic study already published. The authors analyzed a subset of patients with confirmed VTE. We described the characteristics of the cohort, such as demographics, clinical status, and laboratory results. We tested differences amid two subgroups of patients, those with VTE or not, with the competitive risk Fine and Gray model. RESULTS: Out of 3186 adult patients with COVID-19, 245 (7.7%) were diagnosed with VTE, 174 (5.4%) of them during admission to the hospital. Four (2.3% of these 174) did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation and 19 (11%) discontinued anticoagulation for at least 3 days, resulting in 170 analyzed. During the first week of hospitalization, the laboratory most altered results were C-reactive protein and D-dimer. Patients with VTE were more critical, had a higher mortality rate, worse SOFA score, and, on average, 50% longer hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Proven VTE incidence in this severe COVID-19 cohort was 7.7%, despite 87% of them complying completely with VTE prophylaxis. The clinician must be aware of the diagnosis of VTE in COVID-19, even in patients receiving proper prophylaxis.

Development of Care and Professional Identity in an Interprofessional Health Team: Graduation, Residency and Professional Practice as a Window of Opportunity / Desarrollo del Equipo Interprofesional de Atención e Identidad Profesional en Salud: Graduación y Posgrado como Ventana de Oportunidad / Desenvolvimento do Cuidado em Equipe Interprofissional e da Identidade Profissional em Saúde: Graduação e Pós-Graduação como Janela de Oportunidade

This integrative review analyzes aspects of professional identity (PI) and its relationship with teamwork, with patient care and safety, in multidisciplinary health teams; from graduation, residency and professional performance. Twenty-two papers were studied, over a period of five years, from the Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases, classified into eleven professional categories, resulting in six papers with undergraduate students, five with undergraduates in professional internships, and eleven with health professionals, including residents. The construction process of the PI of residents and professionals who work in the hospital environment was analyzed, noting that, for the medical profession, it is necessary to change the paradigm regarding PI and teamwork, while for the other professionals it is that It is necessary to develop the PI process from graduation onwards, as an important factor in the work environment, for the management of conflicts between members of the health teams.

Esta revisión integradora analiza aspectos de la identidad profesional (IP) en equipos multiprofesionales de salud, desde la graduación. Se estudiaron veintidós artículos, en un período de cinco años, de las bases de datos Embase, Scopus y Web of Science, clasificados en once categorías profesionales, resultando seis artículos con estudiantes de pregrado, cinco con prácticas profesionales y once con profesionales de la salud. Se analizó el proceso de construcción de la IP de los residentes y profesionales que actúan en el ámbito hospitalario, observando que, para la profesión médica, es necesario un cambio de paradigma sobre la IP y el trabajo en equipo, mientras que para los demás profesionales es necesario desarrollar la Proceso de PI en el ambiente de trabajo, como factor importante para la gestión de conflictos entre los integrantes de los equipos de salud.

Esta revisão integrativa analisa aspectos da identidade profissional (IP) em equipes multiprofissionais da saúde, desde a graduação. Foram estudados vinte e dois artigos, no período de cinco anos, das bases de dados Embase, Scopus e Web of Science, classificados em onze categorias profissionais, resultando em seis artigos com alunos de graduação, cinco com estágios profissionalizantes e onze com profissionais da saúde. Analisou-se o processo de construção da IP de residentes e profissionais que atuam no ambiente hospitalar, observando-se que, para a profissão médica é necessária a mudança de paradigma sobre IP e trabalho em equipe, enquanto que para os demais profissionais faz-se necessário desenvolver o processo de IP no ambiente de trabalho, como fator importante para a gestão de conflitos entre os integrantes das equipes de saúde.

Análise das solicitações de medicamentos não padronizados de um hospital universitário terciário / Analysis of requests for non-standard medicines from a tertiary university hospital

Introdução: O uso extensivo de medicamentos não padronizados causa aumento de custos em saúde, além de potencial redução de segurança e uso racional de medicamentos. A Comissão de Farmácia e Terapêutica orienta a prescrição de medicamentos, por meio da avaliação e seleção de medicamentos a serem incluídos no formulário de medicamentos padronizados, com base nas melhores evidências científicas disponíveis e no perfil dos pacientes locais, promovendo o uso racional de medicamentos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar as solicitações de fornecimento de medicamentos não padronizados na instituição. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo observacional e descritivo onde foram analisadas as solicitações de medicamentos não padronizados realizadas entre fevereiro de 2016 e dezembro de 2021, identificando os medicamentos envolvidos e seus respectivos custos. Resultados: Foram realizadas 203 solicitações no período, sendo 174 incluídas no estudo. Os medicamentos que tiveram mais solicitações foram o rituximabe (41), a imunoglobulina humana (31), o sucralfato (23), a nitazoxanida (12) e o eltrombopague (7). As solicitações com maior custo foram as de imunoglobulina humana (US$ 799,702.38), rituximabe (US$ 717,320.26), eltrombopague (US$ 281,062.50), ruxolitinibe (US$ 167,867.46) e bortezomibe (US$ 149,033.52). As principais clínicas que solicitaram medicamentos não padronizado foram a neurologia (47), a hematologia (30), as moléstias infecciosas e parasitárias (17), e a anestesiologia (12). As solicitações de maior custo foram realizadas pela neurologia (US$ 145,519.08), hematologia (US$ 120,980.25), transplante de medula óssea (US$ 51,635.11) e dermatologia (US$ 44,813.40). Conclusão: O estudo demonstrou que há um fluxo estruturado de solicitação de medicamentos não padronizados na instituição, sendo uma importante ferramenta de gerenciamento dessas solicitações, evitando a aquisição desnecessária de itens que não compõem o elenco terapêutico do hospital.

Introduction: Widespread use of non-formulary drugs (NFD) increases cost and may reduce safety and rational use of medicines. The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee provides guidance on drug prescription by evaluating and selecting medications to be included in a hospital's formulary based on best scientific evidence available and local patients' profile, promoting rational use of medicines. The objective of this study was to assess non-formulary drugs prescriptions at a tertiary hospital. Methods: This was a retrospective study. NFD prescribed and its associated costs were assessed through NFD request forms received from February 2016 to December 2021. Results: A total of 203 NFD request forms were received, from which 174 were included in this study. The most frequently prescribed NFD included rituximab (n = 41), immunoglobulin (31), sucralfate (23), nitazoxanide (12), and eltrombopag (7), with the highest costs being with immunoglobulin (US$ 799,702.38), rituximab (US$ 717,320.26), eltrombopag (US$ 281,062.50), ruxolitinib (US$ 167,867.46), and bortezomib (US$ 149,033.52). The most frequent requesting specialties were neurology (n = 47), hematology (30), infectious disease (17) and anesthesiology (12), and highest costs requests were from neurology (US$ 145,519.08), hematology (US$ 120,980.25), bone marrow transplant unit (US$ 51,635.11), and dermatology (US$ 44,813.40). Conclusion: This study showed that a structured request flow for NFD prescription is a critical procedure in order to better manage drug prescription within the hospital, promoting rational use of medicines and preventing unnecessary spending with drugs for which the clinical indication may be covered by a drug already in the hospital's formulary.

Immunothrombosis and COVID-19 ‒ a nested post-hoc analysis from a 3186 patient cohort in a Latin American public reference hospital

Abstract Objective COVID-19 is associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolism and excess mortality. Difficulties with best anticoagulation practices and their implementation motivated the current analysis of COVID-19 patients who developed Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). Method This is a post-hoc analysis of a COVID-19 cohort, described in an economic study already published. The authors analyzed a subset of patients with confirmed VTE. We described the characteristics of the cohort, such as demographics, clinical status, and laboratory results. We tested differences amid two subgroups of patients, those with VTE or not, with the competitive risk Fine and Gray model. Results Out of 3186 adult patients with COVID-19, 245 (7.7%) were diagnosed with VTE, 174 (5.4%) of them during admission to the hospital. Four (2.3% of these 174) did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation and 19 (11%) discontinued anticoagulation for at least 3 days, resulting in 170 analyzed. During the first week of hospitalization, the laboratory most altered results were C-reactive protein and D-dimer. Patients with VTE were more critical, had a higher mortality rate, worse SOFA score, and, on average, 50% longer hospital stay. Conclusion Proven VTE incidence in this severe COVID-19 cohort was 7.7%, despite 87% of them complying completely with VTE prophylaxis. The clinician must be aware of the diagnosis of VTE in COVID-19, even in patients receiving proper prophylaxis.

COVID-19: como informações baseadas em evidências auxiliaram um hospital terciário durante o primeiro ano pandêmico / COVID-19: how evidence-based information supported a tertiary hospital during the first pandemic year

Introdução: Durante a pandemia de COVID-19, a necessidade por uma informação confiável, rápida e precisa desafiou os profissionais de saúde de todo o mundo. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar e comparar as solicitações dos profissionais da saúde realizadas a um Centro de Informação Sobre Medicamentos (CIM) em um ano pré-pandêmico e durante o primeiro ano pandêmico. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo e retrospectivo, que analisou as perguntas realizadas ao CIM do Instituto Central do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (ICHCFMUSP) quanto ao seu assunto, classificação ATC dos medicamentos envolvidos e profissionais solicitantes. Resultados: Os resultados demonstram que, de maneira geral, durante o primeiro ano pandêmico houve um aumento de 454 perguntas (66,13%; p < 0,01). As dúvidas se referiam principalmente a questões de administração, estabilidade/compatibilidade e padronização do medicamento na instituição, sendo o farmacêutico o profissional que realizou maior número de questionamentos. Ao seccionar as perguntas, verificou-se que a maioria das informações solicitadas se referiram a agentes infecciosos, agentes que atuam no sangue/órgãos hematopoiéticos e sistema nervoso. Conclusão: Considerando o cenário pandêmico, com sobrecarga dos serviços de saúde, contratação em massa de novos profissionais e pouca disponibilidade de informações com embasamento científico, as evidências fornecidas pelo CIM, aliadas ao entendimento do quadro clínico de cada paciente, com certeza auxiliaram em um melhor desfecho clínico, bem como foram essenciais no uso racional de medicamentos no combate a pandemia de COVID-19.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic the need for reliable, fast and accurate information challenged healthcare professionals around the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the requests made by health professionals to a Drug Information Center (DIC) in a pre-pandemic year and during the first year of the pandemic. Methods: This is a quantitative and retrospective study that analyzed the solicitations made to the DIC of the Instituto Central do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (ICHCFMUSP) regarding its subject, ATC classification of drugs involved and requesting professionals. Results: The results show that, in general, during the first pandemic year there was an increase of 454 questions (66.13%; p < 0.01). The questions referred mainly to issues of administration, stability/compatibility and standardization of the medicines in the institution, being the pharmacist the professional who asked the most number of questions. When sectioning the questions, it was found that most of the information requested referred to infectious agents, agents that act on the blood/hematopoietic organs and the nervous system. Conclusion: Considering the pandemic scenario, with an overload of health services, large number of hires of new professionals and lack of availability of scientifically based information, the evidence provided by the DIC, combined with the understanding of clinical condition of each patient, certainly helped in a better outcome for each patient, as well as being essential in the rational use of medicines in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Access to antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B during COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B is an important public health concern. Currently, the COVID-19 pandemic is a major challenge for health systems, and the access to pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment of chronic diseases, such as hepatitis B, may have been affected due to the contingency measures. This study aimed to evaluate the access to antiviral therapy during the ongoing pandemic. METHODS: This was a descriptive analysis of the access to treatment for chronic hepatitis B at a tertiary-level university hospital in São Paulo, integrated with the Brazilian health system. The study was conducted from April to December 2020. RESULTS: Access to antiviral therapy for 225 patients was assessed. The majority of the population was male (59%). The main type of service was the Programa Medicamento em Casa (Home Medication Delivery Program), which was availed by 144 (64%) patients. Women had poorer access to antiviral therapy (56%, p<0.05), and patients registered in the HMDP (68%, p<0.05) had better access. The age group of >48 years represented 70% of the group without access to antiviral therapy. Twenty-two pharmaceutical appointments were conducted through phone calls with patients without access to antiviral therapy. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the rationalization of efforts in a public health crisis through the identification of groups with the highest risk of poor access to antiviral therapy and the demonstration of the benefits of a medication delivery system.

Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial With N-acetylcysteine for Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND: A local increase in angiotensin 2 after inactivation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may induce a redox imbalance in alveolar epithelium cells, causing apoptosis, increased inflammation and, consequently, impaired gas exchange. We hypothesized that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) administration could restore this redox homeostasis and suppress unfavorable evolution in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center trial conducted at the Emergency Department of Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil, to determine whether NAC in high doses can avoid respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19. We enrolled 135 patients with severe COVID-19 (confirmed or suspected), with an oxyhemoglobin saturation <94% or respiratory rate >24 breaths/minute. Patients were randomized to receive NAC 21 g (~300 mg/kg) for 20 hours or dextrose 5%. The primary endpoint was the need for mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints were time of mechanical ventilation, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), time in ICU, and mortality. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups, with no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, medicines taken, and disease severity. Also, groups were similar in laboratory tests and chest computed tomography scan findings. Sixteen patients (23.9%) in the placebo group received endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, compared with 14 patients (20.6%) in the NAC group (P = .675). No difference was observed in secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of NAC in high doses did not affect the evolution of severe COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC): U1111-1250-356 (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8969zg/).

A randomized crossover trial to assess therapeutic efficacy and cost reduction of acid ursodeoxycholic manufactured by the university hospital for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Health care costs are growing faster than the rest of the global economy, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Countries' health expenditures include paying for general medicine, diagnostic procedures, hospitalizations and surgeries, as well as medications and prescribed treatment. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare autoimmune liver disease and the first line available treatment is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), however, direct and indirect treatment costs are expensive. Main aim of this trial was to assess if the therapeutic efficacy of UDCA manufactured by the university hospital is equivalent to that of standard UDCA and treatment cost reduction in patients with PBC. METHODS: It is a prospective, interventional, randomized, and crossover study in patients diagnosed with PBC. UDCA 300 mg tablets and capsules were developed and manufactured by the university hospital. Thirty patients under treatment with standard UDCA, in stable doses were randomized in sequence A and B, 15 patients in each arm. The groups were treated for 12 weeks and after, the UDCA formulation was changed, following for another 12 weeks of continuous therapy (tablets and capsules / capsules and tablets). Laboratory tests were performed at time T0 (beginning of treatment), T1 (at the 12 week-therapy, before the crossing-over) and T2 (end of treatment). The evaluation was done by comparing the hepatic parameters ALP, GGT, ALT, AST and total bilirubin, also considering the adverse events. The comparison of costs was based on price of the manufactured UDCA and standard UDCA price of the hospital. RESULTS: Hospital reduced 66.1% the PBC treatment costs using manufactured UDCA. There were no differences in the biochemical parameters between sequence (A and B) and tablets or capsules of UDCA formulations applied in the treatment of PBC. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that there was no significant difference between manufactured UDCA (capsule and tablet) and standard UDCA. Hospital reduced the PBC treatment costs using the manufactured UDCA by the university hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03489889 retrospectively registered on January 12th, 2018; Ethics Committee approved the study (ID: 1.790.088) on October 25th, 2016.

Pharmaceutical care-based interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of pharmaceutical care-based interventions on type 2 diabetes mellitus . METHODS: PubMed®, Cochrane and Web of Science data bases were searched for randomized controlled clinical trials. Studies evaluating pharmaceutical care-based interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus published between 2012 and 2017 were included. Glycated hemoglobin was defined as the primary endpoint; blood pressure, triglycerides and cholesterol as secondary endpoints. The random effects model was used in meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen trials involving 2,325 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed considerable heterogeneity (I2>97%; p<0.001), reduction in glycated hemoglobin (-1.07%; 95%CI: -1.32; -0.83; p<0.001), glucose (-29.91mg/dL; 95%CI: -43.2; -16.6; p<0.001), triglyceride (19.8mg/dL; 95%CI: -36.6; -3.04; p=0.021), systolic blood pressure (-4.65mmHg; 95%CI: -8.9; -0.4; p=0.032) levels, and increased HDL levels (4.43mg/dL; 95%CI: 0.16; 8.70; p=0.042). CONCLUSION: Pharmaceutical care-based clincal and education interventions have significant impact on type 2 diabetes mellitus . The tools Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale may be useful to monitor patients.

Avaliação da economia gerada por meio das intervenções farmacêuticas realizadas em um hospital universitário terciário de grande porte / Evaluation of cost savings generated through pharmaceutical inverventions performed in a large tertiary university hospital

Introdução: A farmácia clínica tem como objetivo garantir uma farmacoterapia adequada ao paciente. A avaliação de prescrição é uma das principais atividades do farmacêutico clínico, o que pode resultar em intervenções e economia para a instituição, além de promover o uso racional e seguro de medicamentos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a economia gerada por meio das intervenções realizadas pelos farmacêuticos clínicos durante o processo de avaliação farmacêutica de prescrição. Métodos: Estudo transversal, observacional e analítico, onde foi analisada a economia gerada através das intervenções realizadas pelos farmacêuticos no período entre janeiro e julho de 2017. Resultados: Foram realizadas 3.033 intervenções no período do estudo e 943 foram incluídas. O valor da economia gerada foi de R$ 72.648,39 (US$ 23.134,95), sendo as intervenções mais frequentes relacionadas à adequação de apresentação (847) e forma farmacêutica (44). Dentre os medicamentos cujas intervenções farmacêuticas resultaram em maior economia, estão a anfotericina B lipossomal (R$ 18.919,75), a daptomicina (R$ 8.575,00), o valganciclovir (R$ 7.452,00) e a anidulafungina (R$ 7.422,35). Algumas intervenções não resultaram em economia direta do tratamento medicamentoso, como ocorreu com a risperidona comprimido (− R$ 264,04) e o sulfametoxazol+trimetoprima comprimido (− R$ 208,62), que foram substituídos por solução oral para administração por sondas. Conclusão: O estudo demonstrou que a atuação do farmacêutico clínico resultou na efetivação de intervenções relacionadas à adequação de dose, correção de diluição, alteração de apresentação, substituição de forma farmacêutica, adequação de tempo de tratamento e a adesão aos protocolos institucionais. Essas intervenções refletiram diretamente na redução de custo dos tratamentos, otimizando recursos e gerando economia ao serviço de saúde. (AU)

Introduction: Clinical pharmacy aims to ensure appropriate pharmacotherapy for patients. Prescription evaluation is one of the main activities of the clinical pharmacist and can result in interventions and cost savings for the institution, in addition to promoting the rational and safe use of medications. The objective of this study was to evaluate cost savings generated through interventions performed by clinical pharmacists during the process of prescription evaluation. Methods: This cross-sectional, observational, analytical study analyzed cost savings generated through interventions performed by pharmacists from January to July 2017. Results: A total of 3,033 interventions were performed during the study period, of which 943 were included. Cost savings amounted to R$ 72,648.39 (US$ 23,134.95), and the most frequent interventions were related to the adequacy of presentation (847) and dosage form (44). The medications whose pharmaceutical interventions resulted in the greatest cost savings are liposomal amphotericin B (R$ 18,919.75), daptomycin (R$ 8,575.00), valganciclovir (R$ 7,452.00), and anidulafungin (R$ 7,422.35). Some interventions did not result in direct cost savings, such as treatment with risperidone tablet (− R$ 264.04) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole tablet (− R$ 208.62), which were replaced by oral solution for tube administration. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the performance of clinical pharmacists resulted in the implementation of interventions related to dose adjustment, dilution correction, change of presentation, replacement of dosage form, adjustment of treatment duration, and adherence to institutional protocols. These interventions directly resulted in the reduction of treatment costs, optimizing resources and generating cost savings for the health system. (AU)

Assessment of the prevalence of vertical hepatitis B transmission in two consecutive generations.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B is an important public health problem in the world and one of the forms of contagion would be through vertical transmission. Precose diagnosis allows the adoption of prophylaxis measures, which results in prevention in more than 90% of cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalences of vertical transmission and compare two generations (mother/patient and patient/child). METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study, which included 101 patients. The interviews were performed through the application of the instrument of data collection and information of the physical file before the medical consultation. RESULTS: The mean ± SD of age was 50.9 ± 13.1 years, the male gender predominated, with 56.4% of the patients, and the predominance was white, with 43.6%. Vertical transmission between mother and patient occurred in 17.8% and between patient and child, in 7.9%. In all of the eight cases of vertical transmission, the diagnosis was after the birth of children infected with HBV, and in 3/8 (37.5%), there was more than one case of infection by this mechanism per patient, totaling 13 children with the disease. CONCLUSION: There was a reduction in vertical transmission, showing that preventive measures were effective.

Assessment of the prevalence of vertical hepatitis B transmission in two consecutive generations / Avaliação da prevalência de transmissão vertical de hepatite B em duas gerações consecutivas

Summary Introduction: Hepatitis B is an important public health problem in the world and one of the forms of contagion would be through vertical transmission. Precose diagnosis allows the adoption of prophylaxis measures, which results in prevention in more than 90% of cases. Objective: To describe the prevalences of vertical transmission and compare two generations (mother/patient and patient/child). Method: This was a cross-sectional study, which included 101 patients. The interviews were performed through the application of the instrument of data collection and information of the physical file before the medical consultation. Results: The mean ± SD of age was 50.9 ± 13.1 years, the male gender predominated, with 56.4% of the patients, and the predominance was white, with 43.6%. Vertical transmission between mother and patient occurred in 17.8% and between patient and child, in 7.9%. In all of the eight cases of vertical transmission, the diagnosis was after the birth of children infected with HBV, and in 3/8 (37.5%), there was more than one case of infection by this mechanism per patient, totaling 13 children with the disease. Conclusion: There was a reduction in vertical transmission, showing that preventive measures were effective.

Resumo Introdução: A hepatite B é um importante problema de saúde pública no mundo e uma das formas de contágio seria através da transmissão vertical. O diagnóstico precoce possibilita a adoção de medidas de profilaxia, o que resulta na prevenção em mais de 90% dos casos. Objetivo: Descrever as prevalências de transmissão vertical e comparar duas gerações (mãe/paciente e paciente/filho). Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, que incluiu 101 pacientes. As entrevistas foram realizadas por meio da aplicação do instrumento de coleta de dados e informações do prontuário físico antes da consulta médica. Resultados: A média ± DP de idade foi de 50,9 ± 13,1 anos, houve predomínio do gênero masculino, com 56,4% dos pacientes, e predominou a cor branca, com 43,6%. A transmissão vertical entre mãe do paciente/paciente ocorreu em 17,8% e entre paciente/filho, em 7,9%. Em todos os oito casos de transmissão vertical, o diagnóstico foi posterior ao nascimento dos filhos infectados por HBV; em 3/8 (37,5%), houve mais de um caso de infecção por esse mecanismo por paciente, totalizando 13 filhos com a doença. Conclusão: Houve uma redução na transmissão vertical, mostrando que as medidas preventivas foram efetivas.

Clinical pharmacology profile of care in Hepatology clinic.

Since 2010, the Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division of the Central Institute of Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo Medical School (HC-FMUSP, in the Portuguese acronym) has been developing specialized electives assistance activities in the Outpatient Specialty Clinic, Secondary Level, in São Paulo NGA-63 Várzea do Carmo. The objective of this study was to analyze the pharmacotherapeutic profile of patients. This is a cross-sectional and retrospective study in which patients were seen at the Hepatology sector and the results were submitted to descriptive statistics. During the study period, 492 patients were treated at the clinic, with a mean age of 58.9 years and frequency of 61.2% female and 74.8% living in São Paulo. This population was served by various other medical specialties (cardiology and endocrine among others) and the major liver diagnoses were: chronic hepatitis B and C and fatty liver. Comorbidities were also identified, such as diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Most patients took their medication in the Basic Health Units. We found that 30% of patients use of more than five medications and the most prescribed were omeprazole 208 (42.3%), metformin 132 (26.8%) and losartan 80 (16.3%). Because it is an adult/elderly population, with several comorbidities and polymedication, it is important to be aware of the rational use of medication. The multidisciplinary team is important in applying correct conducts for the safe use of medicines, to reduce the burden on health spending and improving the quality of life of patients.

Clinical pharmacology profile of care in Hepatology clinic / Perfil clínico farmacológico dos atendimentos no ambulatório de Hepatologia

Summary Since 2010, the Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division of the Central Institute of Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo Medical School (HC-FMUSP, in the Portuguese acronym) has been developing specialized electives assistance activities in the Outpatient Specialty Clinic, Secondary Level, in São Paulo NGA-63 Várzea do Carmo. The objective of this study was to analyze the pharmacotherapeutic profile of patients. This is a cross-sectional and retrospective study in which patients were seen at the Hepatology sector and the results were submitted to descriptive statistics. During the study period, 492 patients were treated at the clinic, with a mean age of 58.9 years and frequency of 61.2% female and 74.8% living in São Paulo. This population was served by various other medical specialties (cardiology and endocrine among others) and the major liver diagnoses were: chronic hepatitis B and C and fatty liver. Comorbidities were also identified, such as diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Most patients took their medication in the Basic Health Units. We found that 30% of patients use of more than five medications and the most prescribed were omeprazole 208 (42.3%), metformin 132 (26.8%) and losartan 80 (16.3%). Because it is an adult/elderly population, with several comorbidities and polymedication, it is important to be aware of the rational use of medication. The multidisciplinary team is important in applying correct conducts for the safe use of medicines, to reduce the burden on health spending and improving the quality of life of patients.

Resumo Desde 2010, a Divisão de Gastroenterologia e Hepatologia Clínica do Instituto Central do HC-FMUSP tem desenvolvido atividades assistenciais eletivas especializadas em Hepatologia no Ambulatório de Especialidades Nível Secundário de São Paulo no Estado de São Paulo NGA-63 Várzea do Carmo. O objetivo do estudo é analisar o perfil farmacoterapêutico dos pacientes. Trata-se de um estudo transversal e retrospectivo, no qual pacientes foram atendidos pelo setor de Hepatologia e os dados encontrados foram submetidos à estatística descritiva. Os resultados demonstraram que 492 pacientes foram atendidos nesse ambulatório durante o período do estudo com a média de idade de 58,9 anos, frequência de 61,2% do sexo feminino e 74,8% residindo na capital paulista. Essa população foi atendida por outras diferentes especialidades médicas (cardiologia e endócrino, entre outras), e os principais diagnósticos hepáticos foram hepatite crônica B e C e esteatose hepática. Também foram identificadas comorbidades como diabetes, hipertensão arterial e dislipidemia. Boa parte da população tende a retirar a sua medicação nas Unidades Básicas de Saúde. Foi verificado que 30% dos pacientes fazem uso de mais de cinco medicamentos, sendo os mais prescritos o omeprazol (208; 42,3%), metformina (132; 26,8%) e losartana (80; 16,3%). Por se tratar de uma população adulta/idosa, com diversas comorbidades e com polimedicação, é importante estar atento ao uso racional do medicamento. O atendimento da equipe multiprofissional é importante para aplicar tomadas de condutas corretas para a segurança no uso de medicamentos e diminuir a oneração em gastos em saúde, melhorando a qualidade de vida do paciente.

Low dose capsule based 13c-urea breath test compared with the conventional 13c-urea breath test and invasive tests.

CONTEXT: One of the limitations of 13C-urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis in Brazil is the substrate acquisition in capsule presentation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a capsule-based 13C-urea, manipulated by the Pharmacy Division, for the clinical practice. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent the conventional and the capsule breath test. Samples were collected at the baseline and after 10, 20 and 30 minutes of 13C-urea ingestion. Urease and histology were used as gold standard in 83 patients. RESULTS: In a total of 50 patients, 17 were positive with the conventional 13C-urea (75 mg) breath test at 10, 20 and 30 minutes. When these patients repeated breath test with capsule (50 mg), 17 were positive at 20 minutes and 15 at 10 and 30 minutes. The relative sensitivity of 13C-urea with capsule was 100% at 20 minutes and 88.24% at 10 and at 30 minutes. The relative specificity was 100% at all time intervals. Among 83 patients that underwent capsule breath test and endoscopy the capsule breath test presented 100% of sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule based breath test with 50 mg 13C-urea at twenty minutes was found highly sensitive and specific for the clinical setting.

Low dose capsul based 13c-urea breath test comared with the conventional 13c--urea breath test and invasive tests / Teste respiratório com 13C-uréia em cápsula de baixa dose em comparação com o teste respiratório com 13C-uréia convencional e testes invasivos

Context One of the limitations of 13C-urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis in Brazil is the substrate acquisition in capsule presentation. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate a capsule-based 13C-urea, manipulated by the Pharmacy Division, for the clinical practice. Methods Fifty patients underwent the conventional and the capsule breath test. Samples were collected at the baseline and after 10, 20 and 30 minutes of 13C-urea ingestion. Urease and histology were used as gold standard in 83 patients. Results In a total of 50 patients, 17 were positive with the conventional 13C-urea (75 mg) breath test at 10, 20 and 30 minutes. When these patients repeated breath test with capsule (50 mg), 17 were positive at 20 minutes and 15 at 10 and 30 minutes. The relative sensitivity of 13C-urea with capsule was 100% at 20 minutes and 88.24% at 10 and at 30 minutes. The relative specificity was 100% at all time intervals. Among 83 patients that underwent capsule breath test and endoscopy the capsule breath test presented 100% of sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions Capsule based breath test with 50 mg 13C-urea at twenty minutes was found highly sensitive and specific for the clinical setting. HEADINGS- Helicobacter pylori. Breath Test. Urea, analysis. .

Contexto Uma das limitações para o teste respiratório com 13C-uréia ser incorporado na prática clínica no Brasil para diagnóstico de infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) é a aquisição do substrato em apresentação de cápsula. Objetivos O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a utilidade de 13C-uréia em cápsula, manipulada pela Divisão de Farmácia de um Hospital terciário para a prática clínica. Métodos Cinquenta pacientes foram submetidos ao teste respiratório convencional com 75mg de 13C-uréia e ao teste com cápsula de 50 mg de 13C-uréia. Amostras de ar expirado foram coletadas no basal e após 10, 20 e 30 minutos da ingestão de 13C-uréia para definição do melhor tempo de coleta. A urease e a histologia foram usadas como padrão ouro em 83 pacientes que se submeteram ao teste respiratório com único ponto de coleta. Resultados Num total de 50 pacientes, 17 foram positivos com teste respiratório convencional com 75 mg de 13C-uréia aos 10, 20 e 30 minutos. Quando esses pacientes repetiram o teste respiratório com 13C-uréia em cápsulas de 50 mg, 17 foram positivos aos 20 minutos (Índice Kappa 1,0; P<0,05) e 15 aos 10 e 30 minutos (Índice Kappa 0,90; P<0,05). A sensibilidade relativa da 13C-uréia em cápsulas de 50 mg foi 100% aos 20 minutos e 88,24% aos 10 e 30 minutos. A especificidade relativa foi de 100% em todos os intervalos de tempo. Entre 83 pacientes que se submeteram ao teste respiratório com cápsula e endoscopia, aqueles que eram H. pylori positivos tiveram teste respiratório positivo e aqueles H. pylori negativo tiveram teste respiratório negativo, mostrando sensibilidade e especificidade de 100%. Conclusões O teste respiratório com cápsula de 50 mg de 13C-uréia ...